Whatever I intend to say with a story, whatever I mean, the ONLY thing a reader has to go by is my words on that page. Those words have to be able to stand alone, without me propping them up, without me rushing to their defense.
That said, I want to link to others who've furthered the discussion on "The Stolen Word":
The Comment Thread after the story (up to 129, as of this posting.)
myli_ny_sy posts on Historical Trauma.
myli_ny_sy posts her deconstruction of "The Stolen Word" (there are spoilers in this.)
ktempest discusses how it's never just a fairy tale.
That said, I want to link to others who've furthered the discussion on "The Stolen Word":
The Comment Thread after the story (up to 129, as of this posting.)

Comments
FWIW, I enjoyed the story.
And I'm glad you enjoyed it. :)
I have to admit that on the rare occasion someone tells me that I obviously haven't examined my privilege, I want to smack them because it's incredibly presumptuous and incredibly condescending. And that's the reason I havne't gotten involved in the discussion over there.
Look at it this way: Art should provoke emotion--positive or negative, that's what it should do. You've certainly been provocative. Go you!
And by the way? Good story.
I actually felt more condescended to in the comments about my writing skills than anything else. In that case, I did have one moment of "Oh no, you did not just say that me." Then I kicked three puppies and felt better. *ahem*
Dear passersby who don't know me: that was a joke.
And I'm glad you liked the story! :)
I surely hope you're not saying that art should be "provocative" by accidentally reinforcing racial slurs against minority groups, right?
I mean, it wasn't her intent to tell a story just to incite people with bigotry. She wrote her story to mean something else, and made a mistake with it. But her goal wasn't to provoke anyone with stereotypes of Rom.
What I mean when I say that art should provoke emotion is that successful art should touch a cord inside its consumer, whether that emotion is joy, sadness, compassion and so on. The least successful art is that which leaves the consumer unaffected. In the case of Lisa's story, her art has gotten people thinking and talking about prejudice and perception. In my opinion, if the discussion creates more light than heat (though lots of heat is inevtiable), it's a good thing.
Thanks for the links.
(And not amazing. Just trying to not be That Author.)
Well, FWIW I read the story, and I didn't find it overly offensive. Gross in spots, but that's about it. ;)
(It was the finger thing, wasn't it?)
(Fingers and monkey poo. ;))
Sorry. Couldn't resist. But what would that email say exactly?
The End.
:)
I shall be giving a workover on that mss this weekend. Just a friendly update.
(Everything else I have to say has been said better in other places. But I liked the story and had forgotten that you even said it was offensive until I saw what Paul had said.)
I was saddened by the comments, how things were worded on both sides, and _how quickly_ the focus veered away from the actual words on the page.
I think you handled it well...
I cringed on your behalf at some of the stuff that was being spouted.
It was horrible, and I'm sorry you had to be on the receiving and of that level of vitriol.
*HUGS*